Dear Friends,
Greetings in Christ!
In our last post, the first church council decided the controversy in Antioch of Syria, whereby the Judaizers were attempting to bring the brethren into the bondage of the law. We learned the key to a pure heart (Ps 24:4; Pr 22:11; Matt 5:8; I Tim 1:5; II Tim 2:22; I Pet 1:22) is faith. Acts 15:9 says our hearts are purified by faith.
Before we move on, however, I want to revisit what I wrote about how Paul may have written to the Galatians by the time of the first church council in Acts 15. This agrees with contemporary conservative scholarship, but I got to thinking about whether we should be looking a little further back. For example, we find some interesting information in the postscripts that the KJV translators included in the Pauline Epistles:
Romans
¶ Written to the Romans from Corinthus, and sent by Phebe servant of the church at Cenchrea.
I Corinthians
¶ The first epistle of the Corinthians was written from Philippi by Stephanas, and Fortunatus, and Archaicus, and Timotheus.
II Corinthians
¶ The second epistle to the Corinthians was written from Philippi, a city of Macedonia, by Titus and Lucas.
Galatians
¶ Unto the Galatians written from Rome.
Ephesians
¶ Written from Rome unto the Ephesians by Tychicus.
Philippians
¶ It was written to the Philippians from Rome by Epaphroditus.
Colossians
Written from Rome to the Colossians by Tychicus and Onesimus.
I Thessalonians
¶ The first epistle to the Thessalonians was written from Athens.
II Thessalonians
¶ The second epistle to the Thessalonians was written from Athens.
I Timothy
¶ The first to Timothy was written from Laodicea, which is the chiefest city of Phrygia Pacatiana.
II Timothy
¶ The second epistle unto Timotheus, ordained the first bishop of the church of the Ephesians, was written from Rome, when Paul was brought before Nero the second time.
Titus
¶ It was written to Titus, ordained the first bishop of the church of the Cretians, from Nicopolis of Macedonia.
Philemon
¶ Written from Rome to Philemon by Onesimus a servant.
Hebrews
¶ Written to the Hebrews from Italy by Timothy.
These postscripts were carried over from the Euthalian tradition, which the KJV translators considered to be authoritative. Modern commentators may scoff at this notion, but not so fast; some recent scholarship has shed new light on the subject.
In Volume 67 of New Testament Tools, Studies and Documents, leading academics compiled a catalogue of manuscripts containing the Euthalian tradition. When one considers the scope of this data, it becomes clear that the Euthalian tradition is a rich source of information. For example:
“The Euthalian system was the primary arbiter of most of the Greek New Testament’s works (everything except the gospels and the book of Revelation) for over a millennium, something that nearly every reader would have encountered, even if selectively.” (1)
Hundreds and hundreds of manuscripts still contain references from the Euthalian system. The references to the cities from which Paul wrote and his “co-authors” are preserved in dozens of extant manuscripts. (2)
In this post, we will be embarking on Paul’s second missionary journey. To make a thorough study of Acts, we should be reading Paul’s Epistles as we travel along with him to the areas where he planted churches. Based on the information available, here is a list of possible dates for Paul’s Epistles (and the rest of the New Testament):
1 James: 45–50 AD
2 I Thessalonians: 50–51 AD
3 II Thessalonians: 51–52 AD
4 I Corinthians: 53–55 AD
5 II Corinthians: 55–57 AD
6 Romans: 56–58 AD
7 Philemon: 60–62 AD
8 Galatians: 60–62 AD
9 Ephesians: 60–62 AD
10 Philippians: 61–63 AD
11 Colossians: 60–62 AD
12 I Timothy: 63–65 AD
13 II Timothy: 63–67 AD
14 Titus: 64–67 AD
15 Hebrews: 63–65 AD
16 Gospel of Matthew: 37–55 AD
17 Gospel of Mark: 63–70 AD
18 Gospel of Luke: 60–63 AD
19 Acts: 63–70 AD
20 Gospel of John: 85–90 AD
21 I John: 85–95 AD
22 II John: 85–95 AD
23 III John: 85–95 AD
24 I Peter: 64–67 AD
25 II Peter: 64–67 AD
26 Jude: 50–65 AD
27 Revelation: 94–96 AD
You may have noticed that I included Hebrews in the Pauline Epistles, bolded in the list above. Again, the KJV translators believed Paul wrote Hebrews. It seems plain to me that they had more insight than the translators of our day. The Euthalian postscript says it was written by Timothy, typical of Paul’s letters. Someone may protest, saying that the KJV translators included the Apocrypha in their version. However, in the original 1611 version, the Apocrypha was placed between the Old and New Testaments for historical references only. They did not consider the Apocrypha to be Scripture.
Hebrews makes 14 letters in total by Paul, the number of completion. As a Pharisee and the most successful missionary among the apostles, Paul would be the obvious choice to author Hebrews, as Paul had the gravitas required to address the Hebrews on the vital subject of New Covenant grace. His fingerprints can be seen in Hebrews 10:38, 11, 13:1 et al. Paul probably left the Epistle unsigned because of the controversy attached to his name among his fellow countrymen. Moreover, Paul understood that he was only an instrument; the real Author was the Holy Spirit.
Now we will pick up where we left off in our last post.
Father, fill us with your Holy Spirit and give us understanding as we read your precious word, which is more than our necessary food, in Jesus’ name. Amen.
Acts 15:30-41
30 So when they were dismissed, they [Paul, Barnabas, Judas Barsabas, and Silas] came to Antioch: and when they had gathered the multitude together, they delivered the epistle:
This is the Epistle which the apostles in Jerusalem sent back to Antioch (Acts 15:20), establishing the doctrine of New Covenant grace. The Gentiles would not have to be circumcised as the Judaizers were telling them.
31 Which when they had read, they rejoiced for the consolation.
I would have rejoiced too! I have never been the sort of person who likes rules. Whenever I have gone looking for a job, if there were paragraphs of cold, detailed information in the job description, I kept scrolling until I found a simple job description with a friendly tone.
I feel the same way about churches. There are quite a few of them that still have not gotten the memo. (Acts 15:20, 29)
32 And Judas and Silas, being prophets also themselves, exhorted the brethren with many words, and confirmed them.
33 And after they had tarried there a space, they were let go in peace from the brethren unto the apostles.
34 Notwithstanding it pleased Silas to abide there still.
35 Paul also and Barnabas continued in Antioch, teaching and preaching the word of the Lord, with many others also.
Teaching and preaching are key components of the ministry. In many churches, you hear a lot of preaching, but very little teaching. A teaching ministry grows a church and makes it healthy. According to Paul, that is the reason for the church: to teach the saints and equip them for the ministry. (Eph 4:11f)
36 And some days after Paul said unto Barnabas, Let us go again and visit our brethren in every city where we have preached the word of the Lord, and see how they do.
Paul has a shepherd’s heart. I confess that I have fallen short in this area. We should make the spiritual health of those we lead to Christ our top priority.
37 And Barnabas determined to take with them John, whose surname was Mark.
38 But Paul thought not good to take him with them, who departed from them from Pamphylia, and went not with them to the work.
In some ways, Barnabas shows even more grace than Paul. Barnabas was willing to give his nephew a second chance. Paul, not so much. An argument ensued:
39 And the contention was so sharp between them, that they departed asunder one from the other: and so Barnabas took Mark, and sailed unto Cyprus;
40 And Paul chose Silas [aka Silvanus], and departed, being recommended by the brethren unto the grace of God.
41 And he went through Syria and Cilicia, confirming the churches.
Acts 15:30-41
When Christians disagree with one another, often the result is the same as it was for Paul and Barnabas, which is good, in that it leads to multiplication. (Rom 8:28) Now their missionary efforts will be doubled. According to tradition, after Barnabas returned to his native Cyprus, he continued to Northern Africa and planted churches. We know John Mark from the Gospel he authored, so suffice it to say everything worked out after all. Paul eventually came around and received Mark as a fellowservant. (Col 4:10; II Tim 4:11; Philem 23f) We will not hear from Barnabas again in Acts, but there are a lot of adventures still to come. Paul and Silas are just getting started.

1 Garrick V. Allen, Kimberley A. Fowler, Emanuele Scieri, Maxim Venetskov, The Euthalian Tradition of the New Testament: A Catalogue of Greek Manuscripts (Leiden/ Boston: BRILL, 2025), p 1.
2. Ibid, p 352.







